Beta

Flashcards Studio

Write, submit, and receive AI feedback with score breakdowns.

Study Settings View Stats

Grades Left 0 this week

AI Graded 0 this week

Tracked Cards 0 saved

Due Review 0 cards

Topic

Question Type

Reader

0 tracked cards Contracts

A buyer and seller signed a final written contract for a used truck stating that the truck was sold "as is" and that the writing was the complete and exclusive statement of the parties' agreement. The buyer seeks to introduce evidence that, before signing, the seller orally promised that the truck had a new engine.
Which statement best describes the parol evidence issue?

Choose the Best Answer

The prior oral promise is generally barred if it contradicts a final integrated writing. The prior oral promise is admissible because merger clauses have no effect as evidence of integration. The prior oral promise is admissible because the parol evidence rule applies only to later modifications. The prior oral promise is admissible to contradict the final complete written contract because oral promises always control writings.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.

More

Flashcards Studio

Question

Choose the Best Answer

Hello